
Author: 🦓 Moh Al-Haifi •🍉🇵🇸 and Khandiz Joni
Contributors: Gary Spinks, Isabelle Drury, Odette Bester, Zac Schaap

We’re building this together because every day we delay, more money flows to fund violence. We’re asking you to tell us where you are in your journey of breaking free from complicit tech, your struggles, discoveries, and victories to help others take action faster. Share your experiences here to help others stop funding genocide.
Did you know the tech you use for work might also be powering genocide?
Most of us don’t. We make technology choices based on features, cost, and convenience, never imagining that our monthly subscriptions could be flowing into what UN Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese documents as an integrated “economy of genocide.”
As of July 2025, over 58,500 Palestinians have been killed in Gaza, with scholars estimating 80% of victims are civilians. Over 1.9 million Palestinians, 85% of Gaza’s population, have been forcibly displaced. These numbers reflect an ongoing genocide and continue to climb as we speak.
Throughout this violence, major tech giants like Google, Amazon, and Microsoft providing AI and cloud services to the Israeli military have seen profits surge from supplying the technologies enabling this violence.

If you’re reading this and feeling a knot in your stomach, you’re not alone.
The shame that surfaces when we realise our tools are complicit can be overwhelming. “How did I not know this? How long have I been funding this? What does this say about me, my values, my business?”
These questions can send us spiralling into a dark place where we freeze, unable to act, carrying the weight of inadvertent complicity like a secret burden.
This shame doesn’t just affect us, it spreads through our teams and organisational culture. If you’re building a business rooted in climate justice, human rights, or regenerative principles, the hypocrisy of unknowingly funding systems of harm can feel like it undermines everything you stand for.
But this web of complicity wasn’t created by accident.
Since the Nakba in 1948, when over half a million Palestinians were forcibly displaced during Israel’s founding with British, American, and German support, Western governments have maintained a pattern of enabling occupation and ethnic cleansing whilst simultaneously proclaiming commitment to human rights.
The same hypocrisy that has characterised decades of policy now runs through the infrastructure of our digital economy. Companies integral to our industry’s infrastructure have deliberately woven themselves into the fabric of how we work, making their services feel indispensable.
We’re being asked to feel again. To let the grief, outrage, and pain rise up, not from guilt or performative concern, but from the deep clarity that comes when our humanity refuses to stay professionally silenced. We don’t need to be perfect. We need to refuse neutrality when our business decisions carry moral weight we can no longer ignore.
The question isn’t whether you’re complicit. In this system, we all are. The question is: what do we do now that we know?
How Big Tech Funds Violence
Project Nimbus shows us the direct pipeline from business operations to military violence. It specifically requires Israeli weapons manufacturers to use Google and Amazon cloud services. Rafael’s Spike missiles, guided by these cloud services, were likely used in the April 2024 attack that killed seven World Central Kitchen aid workers.
This means the technology powering your email system, file storage, or website hosting may be the same infrastructure processing targeting data for precision strikes on civilians.
Microsoft’s Azure AI services consumption by the Israeli military increased 64-fold by March 2024 compared to pre-genocide levels. The same artificial intelligence optimising your business processes learns from systems designed to identify and eliminate human targets.
That’s a lot to take in. The reality that our everyday tools share foundations with systems designed to kill is almost incomprehensible. Many of us will want to look away from this information because it’s too painful to hold.
Even booking accommodation for time away contributes to this economy. Booking.com more than doubled its listings in illegal West Bank settlements between 2018 and 2023, creating active revenue streams that make settlement expansion profitable and sustainable.

Designed to Keep You Trapped
Big Tech has intentionally designed systems that become increasingly difficult to leave once adopted, cloud services that integrate with email platforms, which connect to analytics tools, which feed into advertising networks. This dependency makes switching feel overwhelming for any organisation, whether you’re running campaigns or simply trying to collaborate as a team.
Many of these platforms emerge from companies founded by veterans of mandatory military cyber security programs, creating networks of technological development explicitly designed for surveillance and control.
Among these are cybersecurity firm Blink, e-commerce startup 8fig, Trigo (whose computer vision technology has been rolled out in Tesco stores), and cloud resource management company Granulate, which was acquired by Intel in 2022. The structural design ensures civilian and military applications share the same foundations.
We carefully track how our business decisions affect the environment, like checking if our suppliers pollute rivers or destroy forests. Yet we rarely ask how our technology choices might contribute to violence or harm against communities elsewhere.
From Silence to Action
History has taught us that silence is complicity, we learned this lesson during the Holocaust when ordinary people’s inaction contributed to extraordinary cruelty. But funding those who directly enable violence represents an even deeper form of complicity.
We’ve mistaken social media posts for resistance whilst the real decisions happen in meeting rooms when procurement teams choose Google Workspace without question, when budgets flow to Meta platforms, or when we book through platforms profiting from illegal settlements.
Our professional choices have become political acts whether we acknowledge this or not. Divestment, the withdrawal of financial support from complicit systems, offers concrete action that those in power don’t want us to consider. While social media advocacy has its place in raising awareness, examining our invoices and changing where our money flows creates the material pressure that can dismantle these systems of harm entirely.

What You Can Do About Your Tech Right Now
The reality is that different organisations face different constraints.
A solo practitioner can make decisions without navigating bureaucracy and red tape, allowing them to move more quickly through the planning and migration process, whilst a company with hundreds of employees using integrated Microsoft systems faces months of coordination across teams. Client requirements, existing contracts, compliance obligations, and team workflows all create legitimate barriers to rapid change.
However, these constraints need not prevent all action.
The most immediate step anyone can take is downgrading paid subscriptions to reduce revenue flowing to documented platforms. If you can’t switch immediately, at least stop paying premium fees for advanced features you may not need. Research alternatives for one tool rather than attempting to overhaul everything at once, this prevents overwhelm whilst building momentum.
- Solo businesses might aim to switch completely within three to six months.
- Small teams can pilot alternative tools with specific projects before making organisation-wide changes.
- Larger organisations might begin by integrating human rights criteria into procurement processes, requiring vendor disclosure about military contracts or settlement business.
Contact the Companies Directly
Customer service communications explaining these decisions create pressure points within these companies. Google employees have already staged internal protests opposing military contracts, with 28 workers fired after sit-ins at company offices. This shows resistance exists within these organisations, external pressure from customers amplifies that internal dissent, and companies do track customer feedback about ethical concerns.
Whether you’re cancelling immediately or simply can’t switch yet due to constraints, letting companies know why you’re reconsidering their services creates documented pressure.
Here’s a template you can adapt:
Subject: Reconsidering services due to ethical concerns
Dear [Company] Customer Service,
I am writing to express serious concerns about your company’s documented involvement in supporting military operations in Gaza, as outlined in UN Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese’s report “From Economy of Occupation to Economy of Genocide.”
This includes [specific concern: cloud services to Israeli military/surveillance technology/settlement listings] which directly conflicts with my values and professional ethics.
[If cancelling: I am therefore cancelling my [specific service/subscription] effective immediately. Please process this cancellation and confirm in writing.]
[If staying for now: Due to [business constraints/existing contracts], we cannot switch immediately, but we have decided to terminate our subscription with your service within the next [timeframe]. We are actively implementing our transition to alternative providers and will no longer work with vendors complicit in funding war and occupation.]
I will be monitoring your company’s policies in this area for any future consideration.
[Your name]
Even this communication contributes to documented feedback these companies receive about ethical concerns, whether you can act immediately or not.
This kind of direct communication, alongside petitions and other forms of pressure, also helps establish the groundwork for international law implementation, even if accountability comes after the violence has been committed. Germany as a state proclaimed “Never Again” after the Holocaust, yet has failed to hold these companies or complicit states accountable. In fact, Germany has become one of the biggest enablers of this current violence.
The documented pressure we create now becomes part of the historical record that future accountability processes will reference.
Case study: What Switching Tech is Really Like
Khandiz Joni is a facilitator, systems designer and artist with over 20 years’ experience across film, sustainability, beauty and wellbeing, and education. Through her studio KHANDID.STUDIO, she offers grounded, imaginative support that puts life at the centre, whether through art, writing, facilitation, or nature-led experiences. Part of her work involves building out tech stacks and working ecosystems for clients, so she understands intimately how complex these systems can become and how challenging migration feels.
For years, Khandiz had been aware of the BDS movement–Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions– movement and answered the call quietly by divesting her money; it started when she moved away from Wix in 2018, after spending countless hours building her website. But like most people, she relied on this information landing in her lap rather than actively seeking it out.
When she started her consultancy, she chose Microsoft 365 over Google Workspace based on cost, convenience, and climate commitments, with no awareness of the wider implications of these corporations. Much of her work was heavily reliant on Excel and Word, and supporting client work remotely meant she needed to work across both Microsoft and Google systems.
Life got in the way, as it does. As a one-person business juggling multiple roles and projects, not to mention difficult family circumstances, finding time to migrate everything felt like a luxury she couldn’t afford.
But it reached a point where she could no longer, in good conscience, keep putting her hard-earned money into corporations complicit in genocide. She told us “I’ve felt impotent in the magnitude of suffering, and for me shouting into the void on social media wasn’t working. The shame led to my mental health suffering. So I did the only thing I know how to do…despite the hassle and inconvenience.”
She spent her summer holiday researching, testing, and migrating her tech stacks away from them. The process wasn’t simple, despite working solo, she manages three different businesses and multiple client account connections, creating a complex setup that required careful planning.
Her migration from Microsoft 365 to Zoho demonstrates what’s possible when you’re committed to conscious choices. She still uses some tools that aren’t perfect; the process is about progress, not purity. Her decision emerged from a clear recognition: “I just didn’t want to keep feeding that machine.”
The emotional toll of realising your tools fund violence, the shame of inadvertent complicity, the overwhelm of complex systems, Khandiz’s experience shows these feelings are normal parts of the process. What matters is moving forward despite the difficulty, not achieving immediate perfection.
Khandiz has created a comprehensive free resource, “Leaving Big Tech: a free guide for small businesses who want out” with tools, tips and a 6-week plan to leave Google, Microsoft, Amazon and Apple behind. You can access the guide here.
Khandiz’s Approach to switching
This isn’t about achieving perfection overnight. Like Khandiz’s approach, this is about progress, not purity. You can adapt this plan depending on your time, capacity, and business setup.
Week 1: Take Stock and Get Clear
Before you can change anything, you need to understand what you’re working with. Make a list of all digital tools you use: email, calendar, file storage, documents, CRM, invoicing, analytics, hosting, website builders.
Mark which ones are owned by Microsoft, Google, Apple, Amazon or Meta. Get clear on your priorities: is this about ethics? simplicity? cost? all of the above?
If you work with collaborators or clients: Let them know a shift is coming. Give people a heads-up that your email or processes might change.
Week 2: Research Your Alternatives
Now you’re looking for tools that meet your needs but sit outside Big Tech’s supply chains. Choose tools that work for your specific situation, whether you need an all-in-one suite or prefer to pick and mix different services.
Alternative tools to explore:
- Zoho – All-in-one suite (mail, CRM, invoices, projects)
- Proton – Secure email and calendar (EU-based, privacy-first)
- Nextcloud – Self-hosted collaboration (files, documents, calendar)
- LibreOffice – Offline document editing
- ONLYOFFICE – Collaborative document editing
- Disroot – Volunteer-run alternative for mail, documents, cloud storage
Tip from Khandiz: If you need an integrated suite, Zoho can replace most Google/Microsoft functions at once. If you prefer to pick and mix, Proton + Nextcloud is a combination others have recommended.
Week 3: Back Up and Declutter
Download everything from Drive, OneDrive, Dropbox. Export email, contacts, calendar, CRM data, and files. Sort what you actually want to keep and delete the rest. Organise into folders ready for upload to your new system.
Even if you’re not ready to switch, downgrade paid subscriptions now to reduce revenue flowing to documented platforms. (Use our email template to inform tech companies about this choice.)
Week 4-5: Begin Migration
This is the heavy lifting, setting up your new systems and making sure everything works before you rely on them completely.
- Set up new email accounts and import past messages
- Upload files to your new system and test access across devices
- Rebuild key templates (invoices, proposals, documents)
- Recreate forms, automations or workflows where needed
- Test email forwarding and calendar sharing if used by clients
Tip from Khandiz: Keep old systems running while you test the new setup, don’t burn bridges until you’re confident.
Week 6: Close Down and Communicate
The final step is letting the world know you’ve moved and shutting down the old systems. Let clients know you’ve moved, especially if your email address changed or working systems are different.
Update your website, email signature, calendar links, or CRM settings. Delete or deactivate accounts you no longer need. Cancel old subscriptions so you’re not double-paying.
Take a breath. You’ve done a big thing.
There will be frustrations. You’ll miss small features. Things won’t work exactly the same. Some integrations might not exist. You might need new habits.
But you’ll adapt quicker than you expect and feel clearer for it.

Making the Big Switch to Ethical Tech Happen
At Zebra Growth, we’ve known about this for over two months now, and we’ve felt stuck ever since. Our team has been mourning. We’ve been in deep pain, witnessing firsthand how shame started to build up, which made us freeze. We’re currently having team conversations about switching our tools and building our own roadmap for the coming weeks. We’re learning and building alongside you, not from a place of having it all figured out.
Individual switching matters, but systemic change requires collective infrastructure. Coordinated disengagement can pressure institutional behaviour at scale, as we’ve seen with other successful divestment movements. Agencies and businesses, as shapers of cultural narratives and economic flows, have particular leverage in this process.
We are beginning to develop shared resources: databases of ethical alternatives, case studies documenting successful migrations, and tools to cross-reference platforms against human rights organisation blacklists. This work extends beyond the current crisis in Palestine; it’s about embedding human rights considerations into every business decision, regardless of which war or colonial project our tools might be funding.
This infrastructure serves practitioners ready to act whilst building capacity for broader transformation. 85% of Gaza’s population have been forcibly displaced whilst companies profit from technologies enabling this displacement. The tools powering our industry represent choices that either sustain systems of harm or withdraw support from them.
We can no longer claim ignorance of these connections. Begin with research into alternatives for one tool. Initiate conversations within your organisation about these findings. If leading a team, pilot alternative platforms with specific projects. Document your experience to support others making similar transitions.
If you’ve started this journey, we’d like to hear about it. Share your switching story, the challenges you’ve faced, the alternatives you’ve discovered. These experiences become resources for others considering similar moves. Our aim is to curate a community-driven collection of stories and resources that will enable businesses globally to move away from complicity and start placing human rights and ethics at the centre of their operations—because we see this as essential to nurturing life itself.
Special thanks to Khandiz Joni for her blog, comprehensive guide, and contributions to this piece. Her insights and expertise were instrumental in shaping this work. Thanks to Gary Spinks for his contributions and edits to this piece.
Sources:
- UN Human Rights Council Report; Official UN report titled “From Economy of Occupation to Economy of Genocide” https://www.un.org/unispal/document/a-hrc-59-23-from-economy-of-occupation-to-economy-of-genocide-report-special-rapporteur-francesca-albanese-palestine-2025/
- Statista; Monthly Gaza fatalities and injuries statistics https://www.statista.com/statistics/1616501/monthly-gaza-fatalities-injuries/
- Wikipedia Gaza War Casualties; Comprehensive casualties overview of the Gaza war https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualties_of_the_Gaza_war
- UN Security Council Press Release; Official Security Council meeting documentation (2024) https://press.un.org/en/2024/sc15564.doc.htm
- AFSC Gaza Companies Report; Report on companies allegedly complicit in Gaza genocide https://afsc.org/gaza-genocide-companies
- UN Nakba Information; Background information about the Nakba https://www.un.org/unispal/about-the-nakba/
- Al Jazeera UN Report Coverage; News coverage of UN report listing companies allegedly complicit in genocide (July 2025) https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/7/1/un-report-lists-companies-complicit-in-israels-genocide-who-are-they
- The Intercept Project Nimbus Investigation; Investigative report on Google and Amazon’s Project Nimbus contract with Israel (May 2024) https://theintercept.com/2024/05/01/google-amazon-nimbus-israel-weapons-arms-gaza/
- Novara Media Tech Giants Report; Report on tech giants and British banks named in Francesca Albanese’s genocide report (July 2025) https://novaramedia.com/2025/07/02/tech-giants-and-british-bank-named-in-francesca-albanese-report-on-gaza-genocide/
- Jewish News Military-Tech Connection; Special report on Israel’s military as a tech startup hub https://www.jewishnews.co.uk/special-report-how-israels-military-became-a-hotbed-for-tech-startups/
- Al Jazeera Project Nimbus; Explainer article on Project Nimbus and Google worker protests (April 2024) https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/4/23/what-is-project-nimbus-and-why-are-google-workers-protesting-israel-deal
- NBC News Google Worker Firings; News report on Google firing workers who protested Israel contract https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/google-fires-workers-protest-israel-contract-project-nimbus-rcna148333
- Palestine Solidarity Repression Report; Report on repression of Palestine solidarity movements in Germany https://www.palaestinaspricht.de/news/report-repression-of-palestine-solidarity-in-germany
- BDS Movement Website; Main website for the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions Movement https://bdsmovement.net/









































